2 May 2022
By WARWICK VAN EDE
Australia recently had its wettest November in 122 years. March and April 2022 have seen unprecedented rainfall in New South Wales. Extensive rainfall events test the patience of every strata manager because they result in numerous complaints about water leaks into strata lots.
Faced with apparently endless demands, owners corporations need to be very clear about their responsibilities, and it is timely to revisit some of the “fundamentals”.
Step 1 - Common Property – It’s the owners corporation’s responsibility!
The primary responsibility of the owners corporation in relation to common property is that the owners corporation is required, pursuant to s106 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (Act):
It is well established in cases decided by the Supreme Court that this duty of the owners corporation is compulsory and is absolute – that is, it is not a duty to use “best efforts” or “take reasonable steps” (Seiwa Pty Ltd v Owners – Strata Plan 35042 [2006] NSWSC 1157).
With very few exceptions, the roof of a building together with associated structures and weatherproofing elements will be “common property”.
The exceptions to this rule will be few and far between and will generally be either:
▪ where there are specific notations on the strata plan to the contrary (for example, in a townhouse development this sometimes occurs); or
▪ where it has been appropriately determined by the owners corporation (including through an appropriate by-law under the Act) that the responsibility for the maintenance and repair of a particular item of common property has transferred to the lot owner.
However, these are exceptions, and generally an owners corporation should work on the basis that keeping buildings “water tight” is an owners corporation responsibility. That can be challenging in conditions of the kind which we are currently facing.
Step 2 - If It Leaks, then the Common Property has Failed
The cases also remind us that as soon as the common property is no longer operating effectively, then it has fallen into a state of disrepair (Seiwa). That means that if the roof is leaking, the owners corporation has breached its statutory duty pursuant to s106 of the Act.
Sometimes owners corporations delay dealing with repairs or maintenance to common property because they look for excuses. How often do we hear strata committees (looking to avoid the expense of common property repairs) make various suggestions about why there is a water leak including (I have heard all of these!):
In the end, the owners corporation has to face up to the need for repairs and maintenance. Owners Corporations will do well to remember that:
(a) the section 106 duty may involve repairing fixtures or fittings which have deteriorated, which are damaged, or are operating inadequately (Ridis v Strata Plan 10308 (2005) 63 NSWLR 449); and
(b) the duty to repair may require the owners corporation to replace items of common property (as opposed to repairing them) where it is reasonably necessary to do so (for example where an item has reached the end of its service life: see Glenquarry Park Investments Pty Ltd v Hegyesi [2009] NSWSC 425).
The lesson here for owners corporations is that there is no time for blame-shifting or prevarication. Owners Corporations should obtain expert advice at the earliest possible moment for their own protection, because one of the consequences of failure of common property is the owners corporation’s potential obligation to pay damages.
Step 3 – Damages payable by the owners corporation for common property failures
Where an owners corporation has breached is duty pursuant to s106 of the Act (e.g. where there is a failure of common property resulting in water ingress) then pursuant to s106(5) of the Act the owners corporation may be required to pay to a lot owner any reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the owner, as damages for breach of that statutory duty.
Again, there is no grace period during which the owners corporation can claim that it is “doing its best” to repair. The owners corporation is potentially liable from the moment that the common property fails.
Damages which have been found to be recoverable by a lot owner against an owners corporation include:
An owners corporation should move as quickly as possible to properly rectify any failure of common property (such as water ingress) so that the potential losses to the owners corporation pursuant to s106(5) are minimised.
Conclusion
It is critical for owners corporations to obtain advice from appropriately qualified persons at an early stage. Ideally, an owners corporation should engage in a process of preventative maintenance where that is possible. For example, it is a “no brainer” for an owners corporation to pay for regular roof maintenance such as the removal of leaves from gutters and valleys rather than waiting until a significant rain event which results in water ingress to the lots below.
Just as critical for an owners corporation is obtaining appropriate advice once common property fails in order to minimise the owners corporation’s potential liability to pay damages pursuant to s106(5) of the Act, and to avoid the additional expense of being involved in proceedings in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
We would like to thank JS Mueller & Co Lawyers for providing this article.
Want more?
From VOLVO, BMW and OFFICEWORKS Check them out. Also, Keep track of your CPD hours with the NEW CPD Diary in your member portal! Log in today.