REINSW  

SEARCH

 Click to Search
   MEMBER LOGIN Username    Password  Remember me Click to Login Forgotten password?  About REINSW  Contact Us   
:: Lastest News Backup
Click to print page
bullet
Urban Taskforce condemns retail bill
Released 12 January 2011



The NSW Government proposal for tougher laws to protect small businesses from retail landlords is well-intentioned, but overlooks the source of the problem, according to the Urban Taskforce.

The government issued a draft of the Retail Leases Amendment Bill 2011 for public comment earlier this week (10 January 2011). The Urban Taskforce Chief Executive Aaron Gadiel said the retail leases law was almost constantly being re-written, but nothing was being done to attack the reasons of the imbalance of power between big shopping centre landlords and smaller retailers.

“In 2008, the Federal Government’s independent economic advisor, the Productivity Commission, exposed the true cause of the problem,” Gadiel said.

The Productivity Commission report, The Market for Retail Tenancy Leases in Australia, detailed how town planning laws are restricting retail competition. It said that small retail tenants face an uphill battle in negotiating with “oligopolistic” shopping centre landlords.

“Town planning laws are the real culprit – that’s the reason that small businesses are in a weak position when they deal with their landlords,” Gadiel said.

“These constant revisions of the Retail Leases Act will have no effect while town planning laws are unreformed.”

The Productivity Commission said that planning controls should be relaxed to boost opportunities for competition and more retail space.

“The Commission belled the cat by publicly declaring that owners of retail concentrations such as shopping centres compete in an oligopolistic fashion with other landlords,” Gadiel said.

“This is a blunt, but accurate assessment of the state of competition between retail landlords at the moment.”

The Productivity Commission found that “some positive economic rents are extracted from consumers as the overall supply of retail space has been restricted.

“This means that consumers are paying the price of restrictive planning laws. The state government should stop fiddling at the edges and tackle the real cause of the problems.”